GroundRules
Sample reviewed packet
Illustrative sample · not a real customerOpen print / PDF view
GroundRules · Sample reviewed packetSample reviewed packet

Public-Record Property Screening Report

Source-backed facts, knowns, unknowns, and verify items before deeper diligence spend.

1240 N Vista St, Los Angeles, CA 90046

Screening status
Preliminary screening result
Coverage
Automated coverage available
Jurisdiction
City of Los Angeles
Project type
ADU / addition feasibility
Contradiction warning
Assessor vs GIS mismatch

Assessor says 6,503 sq ft. GIS parcel says 6,211 sq ft.

Verify parcel dimensions before you make an offer, quote a project, or rely on deeper diligence assumptions.

Source-backed signal only. GroundRules surfaces the conflict and marks it for verification. This is not a claim about which source is final.

01

Confirmed property facts

Parcel confirmed

Parcel matched and confirmed against the geocoded point. The facts below are pulled directly from official public records and cited to their source.

Known / unknown / verify

Known facts stay source-backed. Unknowns stay explicit. Verify items stay separated so this report does not over-claim certainty.

Assessor Parcel Number (APN)
5530-012-018
high confidenceLA County Assessor — Parcel Map Service
Lot size
6,503 sq ft (0.149 ac)
high confidenceLA County GIS · approx. from parcel geometry
Existing building area
1,684 sq ft
medium confidenceLA County Assessor — assessor-reported
Year built
1924
medium confidenceLA County Assessor — assessor-reported
Use type
Single-family residence
medium confidenceLA County Assessor — assessor-reported
02

Zoning, decoded

Zoning code[Q]RD1.5-1-HPOZ

Restricted-density multiple dwelling

  • Q“Q” Qualified — permanent conditions are attached to this zoning
  • RD1.5Restricted-density multiple dwelling
  • 1Height District 1 — base height & floor-area limits
  • HPOZHistoric Preservation Overlay Zone — historic design review applies

Plain-language reference only — confirm the exact permitted uses, conditions, and development standards in ZIMAS before relying on them. This plain-language reference is not a zoning determination or a permitted-use ruling.

03

What GroundRules checked and found

GroundRules checked the submitted address against US Census Bureau — Geographies API (Public AR Current benchmark), LA County Office of the Assessor — Parcel Map Service, and other cited public-source references. The screening identified that this property appears to fall under City of Los Angeles and surfaced a zoning signal of [Q]RD1.5-1-HPOZ.

This report remains preliminary because GroundRules still expects manual verification before parcel-specific conclusions are relied on or delivered as final advice.

Customers can still use this screening result before spending money because it shows what GroundRules safely found, what it refused to guess, and where deeper due diligence should focus before design, underwriting, purchase, listing, or contractor conversations move forward.

Fire / hazard screening result: Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ): No — parcel not within a mapped VHFHSZ (confirm with city). That is a useful signal, but it should still be confirmed against the cited public source before anyone relies on it for go/no-go decisions.

Why this matters before you spend

A wrong property assumption can cost thousands. This packet separates what public records support from what still needs verification — so design, underwriting, listing, bidding, or contractor conversations start from confirmed facts, not guesses.

04

Other screening signals

Normalized address
1240 N VISTA ST, LOS ANGELES, CA, 90046
high confidenceUS Census Bureau — Geographies API
Jurisdiction detected
City of Los Angeles
high confidenceUS Census Bureau — Geographies API
Zoning signal
[Q]RD1.5-1-HPOZ
high confidenceLA City Planning GIS / ZIMAS
Fire / hazard signal
Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ): No — parcel not within a mapped VHFHSZ (confirm with city)
high confidenceCity of LA — VHFHSZ layer
05

What GroundRules refused to guess

  • Parcel-specific APN, lot size, building area, permit history, or parcel match unless manually verified
  • ADU approval likelihood, entitlement path, or permit-readiness
  • Zoning, setback, height, or use conclusions that depend on an unverified parcel match
  • Final buildability, investment feasibility, or code compliance determinations
06

What still needs verification

  • Parcel identity and APN before relying on parcel-specific facts
  • Lot size and parcel dimensions
  • Existing building area and building details
  • Permit history, open permits, and violations
  • ADU-specific zoning and development standards
  • Overlay or hazard constraints that could affect scope, cost, or review path
07

Recommended next steps

  1. 1Confirm the parcel record and APN before relying on parcel-specific facts.
  2. 2Verify ADU-specific zoning and development standards with the cited jurisdiction sources before design or pricing decisions move forward.
  3. 3Check permit history, overlays, and hazard triggers before anyone treats the opportunity as permit-ready.
  4. 4Use this report to decide whether a deeper manual review is warranted before more money is spent.
08

Sources referenced

  • US Census Bureau — Geographies API (Public AR Current benchmark)
  • LA County Office of the Assessor — Parcel Map Service
  • City of Los Angeles — City Planning Department GIS / ZIMAS
  • City of Los Angeles — Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (LA GeoHub)
  • ZIMAS — Zone Information and Map Access System (verify)
  • LADBS — Los Angeles Department of Building & Safety (verify)
QA
Reviewed
GroundRules quality-assurance review
Reviewed by
GroundRules Review Team
Review ID
GR-SAMPLE-001
Compiled
June 21, 2026
Facts checked against the cited public sourcesUnknowns withheld, not guessedSources listed with retrieval context

Released under GroundRules’ manual quality-assurance workflow. This is a screening packet, not a permit, zoning, or buildability determination.

Important notice

This is a preliminary screening result, not a permit approval, buildability determination, or legal / architectural / engineering / survey opinion. Missing or parcel-specific facts require manual verification before design, acquisition, pricing, listing, or permitting decisions rely on this property.

Methodology. Facts are retrieved from official public sources, each cited with its source note and a confidence label. Known facts stay source-backed, unknowns stay explicit, and verify items stay separate from claims. A reviewer checks the packet against the cited sources before release. This is a screening packet — not a permit, zoning, or buildability determination.
GR-SAMPLE-001 · Sample reviewed packet · Unknowns shown, not hiddenScreen properties →
$149

A human-reviewed flagged-property packet — useful before deeper diligence, quotes, or offer assumptions.

~$5,000

What a professional pre-design review can cost, weeks later.

$0

If your jurisdiction isn’t covered yet. You only pay for a real answer.